<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 日工程師批超薄麥書</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.macgrass.com/permalink/2073/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.macgrass.com/permalink/2073</link>
	<description>小麥草地</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 15:19:53 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7-beta3</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Johnny Chan</title>
		<link>http://www.macgrass.com/permalink/2073/comment-page-1#comment-45546</link>
		<dc:creator>Johnny Chan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2008 13:23:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.macgrass.com/permalink/2073#comment-45546</guid>
		<description>正如好多大陸 iPod 都可以做到跟 iPod 外表接近一樣但價錢更平，佢地都會話 iPod「無咩特別」。</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>正如好多大陸 iPod 都可以做到跟 iPod 外表接近一樣但價錢更平，佢地都會話 iPod「無咩特別」。</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 求其</title>
		<link>http://www.macgrass.com/permalink/2073/comment-page-1#comment-45506</link>
		<dc:creator>求其</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2008 04:19:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.macgrass.com/permalink/2073#comment-45506</guid>
		<description>講左答案你知既IQ題
你都會話：好易姐原來！我都識答啦！</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>講左答案你知既IQ題<br />
你都會話：好易姐原來！我都識答啦！</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 老牛</title>
		<link>http://www.macgrass.com/permalink/2073/comment-page-1#comment-45434</link>
		<dc:creator>老牛</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Feb 2008 09:08:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.macgrass.com/permalink/2073#comment-45434</guid>
		<description>同意Kelly的說法,日本仔永遠覺得自己做野/產品最好. 無錯佢地包裝同設計有一手,見sony/fujisu或日本手機就知 .靚係靚,但看覺得點出都冇imac/iphone/ipod或其他來自歐洲的產品果種簡約美,果種大氣... 呢個亦都係鐘意apple的一大原因. 
日本野靚,但我唔識欣賞;所以或者呢班工程師實在太鐘意自己野,而睇低左人地的...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>同意Kelly的說法,日本仔永遠覺得自己做野/產品最好. 無錯佢地包裝同設計有一手,見sony/fujisu或日本手機就知 .靚係靚,但看覺得點出都冇imac/iphone/ipod或其他來自歐洲的產品果種簡約美,果種大氣&#8230; 呢個亦都係鐘意apple的一大原因.<br />
日本野靚,但我唔識欣賞;所以或者呢班工程師實在太鐘意自己野,而睇低左人地的&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kelly</title>
		<link>http://www.macgrass.com/permalink/2073/comment-page-1#comment-45432</link>
		<dc:creator>Kelly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Feb 2008 08:23:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.macgrass.com/permalink/2073#comment-45432</guid>
		<description>I'm a bit surprised by the arrogance of some of these so called engineers. A sentence like this one makes me mad: “I can’t find anything that is technically superior. We can make the same computer at a lower cost”

No offense to some Japanese engineers I admire and happen to know, but such bold statement from someone as an engineer from a major PC manufacturer in Japan makes me laugh.

I am sure that there is some room for improvement on the MacBook Air, but this article is somehow typical from the Japanese media.

It is always impressive how people dismiss other work and always think they can do better job. If they really can, they should just do it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m a bit surprised by the arrogance of some of these so called engineers. A sentence like this one makes me mad: “I can’t find anything that is technically superior. We can make the same computer at a lower cost”</p>
<p>No offense to some Japanese engineers I admire and happen to know, but such bold statement from someone as an engineer from a major PC manufacturer in Japan makes me laugh.</p>
<p>I am sure that there is some room for improvement on the MacBook Air, but this article is somehow typical from the Japanese media.</p>
<p>It is always impressive how people dismiss other work and always think they can do better job. If they really can, they should just do it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chad</title>
		<link>http://www.macgrass.com/permalink/2073/comment-page-1#comment-45194</link>
		<dc:creator>Chad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2008 11:27:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.macgrass.com/permalink/2073#comment-45194</guid>
		<description>就文章看來，日工程師並沒有說超薄麥書物非所值，只認為蘋果可在降低成本上多下工夫。
我想，您是誤會了。</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>就文章看來，日工程師並沒有說超薄麥書物非所值，只認為蘋果可在降低成本上多下工夫。<br />
我想，您是誤會了。</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 劍茗</title>
		<link>http://www.macgrass.com/permalink/2073/comment-page-1#comment-45192</link>
		<dc:creator>劍茗</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2008 11:08:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.macgrass.com/permalink/2073#comment-45192</guid>
		<description>一般用家都只注重外表、介面，apple 只是市場導向，無謂曲高和寡。</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>一般用家都只注重外表、介面，apple 只是市場導向，無謂曲高和寡。</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.297 seconds -->
