<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 計錯數的Calculator</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.macgrass.com/permalink/1596/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.macgrass.com/permalink/1596</link>
	<description>小麥草地</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 17:49:47 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7-beta3</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: atropos</title>
		<link>http://www.macgrass.com/permalink/1596/comment-page-1#comment-34501</link>
		<dc:creator>atropos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Feb 2007 17:29:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.macgrass.com/permalink/1596#comment-34501</guid>
		<description>Those equation are different....
19% is equal = 19/100...

if the equation is work... it should be a simple truncation error in computer i.e. round of or dump value in bin.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Those equation are different&#8230;.<br />
19% is equal = 19/100&#8230;</p>
<p>if the equation is work&#8230; it should be a simple truncation error in computer i.e. round of or dump value in bin.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ali</title>
		<link>http://www.macgrass.com/permalink/1596/comment-page-1#comment-34500</link>
		<dc:creator>Ali</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Feb 2007 17:01:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.macgrass.com/permalink/1596#comment-34500</guid>
		<description>i am using iMac G4 15' 800 Mhz
When i try 100*1.1 and 100 10%, the answers are the same.
But when i try the above equations, different answers returned (even precision was set to 11) !!! so queer.......</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i am using iMac G4 15&#8242; 800 Mhz<br />
When i try 100*1.1 and 100 10%, the answers are the same.<br />
But when i try the above equations, different answers returned (even precision was set to 11) !!! so queer&#8230;&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: decelerate</title>
		<link>http://www.macgrass.com/permalink/1596/comment-page-1#comment-34499</link>
		<dc:creator>decelerate</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Feb 2007 15:39:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.macgrass.com/permalink/1596#comment-34499</guid>
		<description>My iBook rendered the same results in both methods.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My iBook rendered the same results in both methods.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Phreak</title>
		<link>http://www.macgrass.com/permalink/1596/comment-page-1#comment-34495</link>
		<dc:creator>Phreak</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Feb 2007 16:08:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.macgrass.com/permalink/1596#comment-34495</guid>
		<description>將 precision set 做 11 或以下，無分別！

View Menu-&#62;Precision-&#62;11</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>將 precision set 做 11 或以下，無分別！</p>
<p>View Menu-&gt;Precision-&gt;11</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TinTin</title>
		<link>http://www.macgrass.com/permalink/1596/comment-page-1#comment-34491</link>
		<dc:creator>TinTin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Feb 2007 12:53:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.macgrass.com/permalink/1596#comment-34491</guid>
		<description>我發現答案是一樣的：
MacBook Core 2 Duo 2.0 GHZ</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>我發現答案是一樣的：<br />
MacBook Core 2 Duo 2.0 GHZ</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chainsaw</title>
		<link>http://www.macgrass.com/permalink/1596/comment-page-1#comment-34487</link>
		<dc:creator>Chainsaw</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Feb 2007 04:09:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.macgrass.com/permalink/1596#comment-34487</guid>
		<description>Calculator的Behaviour和一般計數不同。

8511.22加19% 不等同於 8511.22加0.19，故此答案不是8511.41。當你在Calculator輸入8511.22加19%，即是做算術時的8511.22加8511.22 * 19%。</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Calculator的Behaviour和一般計數不同。</p>
<p>8511.22加19% 不等同於 8511.22加0.19，故此答案不是8511.41。當你在Calculator輸入8511.22加19%，即是做算術時的8511.22加8511.22 * 19%。</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: msted</title>
		<link>http://www.macgrass.com/permalink/1596/comment-page-1#comment-34484</link>
		<dc:creator>msted</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Feb 2007 03:57:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.macgrass.com/permalink/1596#comment-34484</guid>
		<description>先不論CPU

這兩個算式根本上就寫錯了...

8511.22 * 1.19 不等於 8511.22加19%

應該改為

8511.22 * 1.19 = 8511.22 加 8511.22 * 19%</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>先不論CPU</p>
<p>這兩個算式根本上就寫錯了&#8230;</p>
<p>8511.22 * 1.19 不等於 8511.22加19%</p>
<p>應該改為</p>
<p>8511.22 * 1.19 = 8511.22 加 8511.22 * 19%</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.502 seconds -->
